Saturday, May 17, 2008




RADHAKRISHNAN AS A PHILANDERER


Dr Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan, the great scholar and philosopher-saint (whose birth anniversary on September 5, is celebrated as The Teacher’s Day throughout India) was also a philanderer having a string of affairs according to his son Sarvepalli Gopal.

Gopal has dwelt upon this aspect of his father’s personality in his book ‘Radhakrishnan, A Biography’. According to him his father began to show an interest in other women from the mid twenties when his intellectual and public life widened and he started traveling continuously far away from home. He says:
“The affair with the neighbor’s wife (in Mysore) was to set the pattern for the long series of involvements of which this was the first. As time passed they formed a fairly constant undercurrent to the decorum of his outward life. But self-indulgence carried with it no emotional investment; he showed his mistresses consideration and, while the relationship lasted, was generous with time, support and money; but he never gave them even the semblance of love. He looked, in these marginal and temporary attachment of senses, for no intellectual partnership; all the women whom he accepted in his life were of superficial mind, some enjoyed dubious reputations and many were dominating and hysterical…..One’s wonder at how Radhakrishnan could have endured such women is tempered by the knowledge that, having embarked on these affairs, he ended them at the first opportunity, though such an opportunity was often long in coming. The company of women, of which he was a compulsive seeker, was like gossip and light reading, an agreeable way of passing the time in the intervals of concentrated work and thought…These affairs diversified but did not disorganize his life. They did not deflect him from his serious purposes…various women helped to keep him youthful…”

While doing serious academic work at Oxford he wrote to his friend Shyama Prasad Mukherjee on April 17, 1930: “I am most unhappy here, feeling absolutely homesick. A lonely love-starved life is not worth much and one who is being mistaken for a religious man has to be more cautious in his behavior. So I am looking homewards and living up to my reputation here!” But his son maintains that even in England the former President had two liaisons; one with an admiring girl training to be a teacher in Manchester and another with the wife of an Indian official in London.

The philosopher’s extra-marital adventures naturally hurt his wife, Sivakamu, a distant cousin, whom he married when she was ten. She was deeply wounded, especially by her husband’s “mistress from the forties, a hard, bitchy woman of jarring and aggressive gracelessness who was determined to flaunt to the world her place in Radhakrishnan’s life". Her marriage if not broken, was certainly fractured but like an ideal Hindu wife she remained completely devoted to her husband.

Radhakrishnan certainly did not practice what he preached. For instance in Calcutta in December 1942, with his mistress seated in the front row he waxed eloquent on the virtues of a faithful, monogamous marriage. Although he laid down the highest standards of human conduct he failed to reach them himself.

18 comments:

Unknown said...

He is like most Indian men are. whatever their social standing. they don't practice what they preach

kailas hosakote said...

He is one among few greatest philosopher-statesmen the world has produced.His works speaks genius in him. For generations to come his valuable writings would be read,re-read and understood for higher standards of living. His alleged negative traits would in no way diminish or come in the way of his sterling personality.Such people are very rare to find, we are fortunate he lived in our times.

Nishant said...

How foolish to even think of such a great man this way!!!!
Going through the complete message does not even give an inkling that he was a philanderer!!!!
Please don;t conclude by looking at one or two incidents. HE was truly a man well respected and a man who lived what he preached and preached what he lived!!!!!
Coming to his son, no one is sure on what he was describing in those paragraphs...secondly if his son did mean that his father was a philanderer, then its a disgrace and shame on his son to write about his father this way!!!!!!!!!!!

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
creative world of nirmalajames said...


I want to know about Radhakrishnan's father .what was his job ?some say he worked under a village jamindar .some books says Veerasami was a tahasildar ..which is correct ?any mention in his son's book?

Saahitya Abhimaani said...

Having dirty linen is OK, but washing it in public is the problem! Hypocrisy nothing but height of hypocrisy.

No Son would have written like the way Gopal wrote about one's father, without truth in what is written. Much credence is attached because Son wrote it and people attribute reasons for that also is hitting below the belt of a person who wishes to keep the history right from all angles.

No wonder Radhakrishnan was President when Nehru was Prime Minister another semi god for people who brush aside personal life faults of these greats as if their (perceived) good work off sets it.

Unknown said...

“Who knows for certain?
Who shall here declare it?
Only he knows-
But he is not there”

Suffice it to say that Dr. Radhakrishnan was a great philosopher, thought leader and teacher.

Answer to Ms. Nirmala: I have read probably written by his son only that Dr. Radhakrishnan's mother was Bhramin lady with whom his father had a relationship. But this info may also be false.

Rami said...

Look, it is not unnatural or uncommon for any man or women to be attracted to the opposite sex. It is god's creation. Feelings, love, sex are very natural aspects of mind & life. Our trained minds will try to force a person to go in a certain path based on culture, religion & a way of life. But you cannot defy god's creation. understand it.

I.M.Sharma said...

His studies in and contributions to Hindu philosophy and propagation, his teaching skills and achievements etc. have to be viewed and assessed separately and not jumbled up with his personal weaknesses or strengths in sexual affairs. In case he harmed anybody particularly in his sexual enterprises then one can pause and criticize. But except his wife who suffered but bore that suffering with fortitude nobody else seem to have been harmed. So one need not take those personal affairs seriously. Every man and every woman has his or her own weaknesses and strengths in such matters.

KVS said...

Nonsense.
Sarvepalli Gopal's words are in blue but this writers words are in black (pun intended). It is not a faithful presentation of S Gopal's input. The writer cleverly added his judgement and opinions.
When a person who understands and experiences philosophy his behavior will be far more profound than ordinary man's ken. Even if such a person involves mundane activities he will be mentally detached.

Gopal's words convey very clearly that the former president's associations with women were only for some break from work, he also very clearly says that it was all platonic and not even love. But see how the writer very bay threw aspersions that he didn't practice what he preached.

This way of unnecessary mudslinging may earn a few likes and comments in its favour but it will leave oneself without an ideal to look up to, and that will eventually lead to a kind of mental crisis later in life.

Unknown said...

People are very judgmental, even his son has failed to understand the great man. It is but natural for women to be swayed bythe personality of dr radhakrishnan.Every person has the right to have a private life,who are we to comment.

Saahitya Abhimaani said...

If there is discrepancy between what's preached and what was in fact practised, people do comment and ut cannot be avoided, howsoever great the man was.

OfftheTrack said...

He seemed to have influenced by the Congress culture which was led from the front by Gandhis and Nehrus and other holier than thou souls

Unknown said...

Come what may , when these come on what kind of impression is created ..
How can anyone be oblivious to the fact that this guy did not pratcise what he preached. He surely cannot be a teacher og any repute.

Rajendra said...

Radhakrishnan was born out of wedlock. He was illegitimate child; a Bastard. His son S.Gopal has himself written about it.

Secondly, he was not a great philosopher as claimed by some here. He was most famous for his book "Indian Philosophy". But the fact is that while he was a Professor of Philosophy in University of Calcutta, he stole the Ph.D. thesis submitted to him for assessment by of one of his student, Jadunath Sinha, and published it in his own name and became famous because of this plagiarism. This has been stated by. Shri Maharaj Krishna Rasgotra in his book.

In the January 1929 issue of Modern Review, Jadunath Sinha made this sensational claim that his own thesis was copied by his teacher Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan in Indian Philosophy book. That Radhakrishnan plagiarised from him. The controversy spilled over up to February, March and April issues of the magazine too.]

In August 1929, Sinha sued Radhakrishnan on this issue. Radhakrishnan also counter-sued both Jadunath Sinha and the editor of Modern Review, Ramananda Chattopadhyay. But latter on when Sinha showed the Postal Registry as proof of despatch and delivery of his thesis, Radhakrishnan requested for a compromise. Dr. Shyamaprasad Mukherjee, who was VC of Calcutta University, arranged for this compromise according to which the court cases were withdrawn and Radhakrishnan paid Rs.10,000/- to Sinha.

Radhakrishnan was also an international lobbyist of Communist Soviet Union while functioning as Indian Ambassador to USSR.

Ritu Mehra said...

Very nice
https://www.ritusacademy.com/2020/08/essay-dr-s-radhakrishnan.html

Unknown said...

Why not?. It would have emerged from the mental torture his mother would have undergone.

Shan Kumar said...

I think you have not read his writings.